The "Twisted" Paper: My Take on the Jan 7th UGC NET Management Exam
The January 7th session of the UGC NET Management (Code 17) exam has just concluded. For many, it was a test of endurance and conceptual depth rather than just memory. If you walked out of the hall feeling that the paper was "lengthy but logical," you aren’t alone.
Here is a comprehensive breakdown of the key highlights and section-wise trends from today’s shift.
Paper 1: A Smooth Start with Data Interpretation
I was pleasantly surprised by the Data Interpretation (DI) section in Paper 1. While DI is often the "time-sink" of the general paper, today’s set was reasonably easy.
Structure: The DI was table-based, focusing on basic Percentage, Average, and Ratio calculations.
Strategy: Starting with this section proved beneficial, as it provided a quick 10 marks and boosted confidence for the more abstract Logical Reasoning and Teaching Aptitude sections.
Paper 2: Management – Deep Dives and Conceptual Twists
While Paper 1 was manageable, Paper 2 demanded a higher level of "application thinking." The questions were rarely direct; instead, they were slightly twisted conceptually, requiring careful elimination of options.
1. Core Heavyweights: Finance & Operations
There was a significant weightage on Finance and Operations.
Finance: Numerical and theoretical questions on Capital Budgeting, Capital Rationing, and the MM Hypothesis were prominent.
Operations: Focused on Inventory Management (EOQ), Transportation and Johnson Scheduling logic.
2. The HR & Strategy Mix
Organizational Behaviour (OB) and Strategic Management sections moved away from simple definitions.
OB: Questions on Motivation theories and Leadership models were presented in situational formats and sequential Formats
Strategy: Frameworks like VRIO and Porter’s Five Forces were tested through "Match the Following" or "Assertion-Reasoning" formats.
3. Focus Area: International Business Theories
One of the most specific areas of focus today was the Theories of International Business. Candidates were tested on the core logic through sequence based questions
The Grand Finale: Reading Comprehension
The exam concluded with two heavy-hitting Reading Analysis passages:
The Compensation Debate: A passage comparing Socialism vs. Capitalism-based compensation, exploring the implications of types of compensation
The Jensen Takeover: A deep-dive into Michael Jensen’s theories on Takeovers, specifically focusing on agency costs and corporate control.
My Personal Take: The "Heart" vs. The "Grace"
Reflecting on my own performance, it was a tale of two halves. I felt a strong sense of control during Paper 1, where I managed to attempt about 80% of the questions whole-heartedly. The logic clicked, and the DI provided the momentum I needed.
However, Paper 2 was a different beast. Given the conceptual twists and the sheer volume of Finance and Strategy questions, I felt truly confident in about 50 - 60% of my attempts. As for the remaining 40%? Between the complex Jensen paragraph and the tricky OB scenarios, those responses have been left entirely to God’s Grace.
Now, the wait begins. To everyone who sat for the exam today: take a deep breath—the hardest part is over
Comments
Post a Comment